Ref Review: The controversial decisions from week 30

Date published: Tuesday 15th March 2016 12:44

Riyad Mahrez: Went down too easily under Colback's challenge

Riyad Mahrez: Went down too easily under Colback's challenge

Our panel debate two highly-dubious decisions in Leicester’s win over Newcastle, while two massive mistakes in Southampton’s victory at Stoke also come up for discussion.

Refereeing decisions are regularly the source of debate among fans, pundits, players and managers so this season a five-strong TEAMtalk panel will be passing judgement on every red card (or avoidance of one), every penalty and any other major incident every matchday.

We’ll also keep a tally of the major decisions to go for and against each team in an attempt to settle the never-ending debate about whether certain clubs are favoured more than others by Premier League referees.

With the FA Cup quarter-finals taking place this weekend, it was a slimmed down Premier League fixture list with only four matches for our panel to review….

 

Modou Barrow penalty appeal v Bournemouth: The Gambian winger scored an excellent goal against the Cherries, but felt he also should have won a spot-kick when a challenge from Charlie Daniels sent him tumbling in the area. Although the referee decided to wave play on, replays showed a foul was definitely committed although the tackle was made inches outside the area anyway. Verdict: Correct decision (not to award the penalty)

Marvin Emnes penalty appeal v Bournemouth: The Swans had a second penalty appeal of the afternoon waved away in the second half when Swans sub Emnes saw a goalbound volley catch Daniels’ hand. But with the ball striking the full-back at close quarters, and with his hand not considered to be in an unnatural position, the ref was once again correct to wave play on. Verdict: Correct decision

Sergio Aguero penalty appeal v Norwich: The City frontman saw a mazy run towards goal curtailed by Norwich defender Timm Klose, with the Argentinian tumbling down inside the area. City made appeals for the spot-kick, but the referee awarded a free-kick only after correctly ruling the challenge to have been made inches outside the box. Verdict: Correct decision

Dusan Tadic penalty appeal v Stoke: The Serbian playmaker latched onto a throughball to bear down on the Stoke goal, but after nudging the ball past Jack Butland, was brought down by the Potters keeper’s outstretched leg. Ref Lee Mason awarded a goalkick after presumably deciding no contact had been made, but oddly, also decided against booking the player for simulation too. One look of Butland’s face straight afterwards told you all you needed to know. Verdict: Incorrect decision

Sadio Mane red card v Stoke: The Saints forward had entered the field as a second-half sub at the Britannia but was not able to complete the match when, challenging Erik Pieters for a high ball, was adjudged to have caught the Dutch full-back with an elbow. The red look harsh on first viewing, and even worse after replays, and it completed a bad afternoon at the office for ref Mason. It was also no surprise to see Saints appealVerdict: Incorrect decision

Jamie Vardy penalty appeal v Newcastle: The Foxes striker saw his run towards goal ended after a being brought down by challenge by Daryl Janmaat, and despite taking a heavy tumble in the box, the referee waved play on. Our panel decided that the Newcastle full-back had got his shoulder in front of the Foxes frontman and the challenge was nothing more sinister than a tangle of legs. Verdict: Correct decision

Foul on Riyad Mahrez in build-up to Leicester’s winner: Newcastle’s makeshift left-back Jack Colback felt like the referee had fallen for a dive when Mahrez took a tumble under his challenge on the touchline. Although a good 45 yards from goal, the free-kick that Mahrez then swung over led to Leicester’s winner – and our panel agrees that the United man was unfortunate. Verdict: Incorrect decision

Possible Vardy offside during Shinji Okazaki’s winner: The rule book states that while Vardy was initially offside before heading the ball back across goal for Okazaki’s acrobatic winner, because of Steven Taylor header, it became “a new phase of play”, and was therefore then deemed to be onside. Verdict: Correct decision

Moussa Sissoko penalty appeal v Leicester: As Newcastle pressed for an equaliser, French midfielder Sissoko fired a powerful volley goalwards that appeared to catch Wes Morgan’s arm as he turned his back on the effort. With the shot heading goalwards and Morgan’s arm/ elbow in an unnatural position and preventing it hitting the target, Newcastle can quite rightly feel aggrieved for a second time in this match. Verdict: Incorrect decision

 

For and Against

Team For Against Total For/Against
1. Man Utd Eight One +7
= Leicester Fourteen Seven +7
3. Liverpool Eleven Six +5
= Tottenham Eight Three +5
5. Man City Nine Five +4
= Aston Villa Six Two +4
7. Sunderland Seven Four +3
8. Watford Five Five 0
= Stoke Six Six 0
10 Everton Two Three -1
11. Newcastle Five Seven -2
= Crystal Palace Three Five -2
= Chelsea Eight Ten -2
14. Arsenal Eight Eleven -3
= West Brom Six Nine -3
= Norwich Two Five -3
17. Southampton Six Eleven -5
= Swansea Five Ten -5
19. West Ham Four Ten -6
= Bournemouth Four Ten -6

Related Articles

Your Say

Home Forums Ref Review: Lee Mason in the spotlight after Saints shocker

This topic contains 5 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by  Swisspotter 8 months, 2 weeks ago.

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #917521
    James Marshment
    James Marshment
    Keymaster

    Our panel debate two highly-dubious decisions in the Stoke v Southampton game, while penalty appeals for Man City and Swansea are discussed.

    [See the full post at: Ref Review: Lee Mason in the spotlight after Saints shocker]

    #920002

    MrRidleyKemp
    Participant

    As a long-time Leicester fan, I can only say…I think you got it about right. The only one I’d even question is Morgan because he clearly didn’t know anything about it, but on seeing replays, he arm is slightly extended, so I wouldn’t have any complaints about seeing that one given.

    #920059

    Paxman
    Participant

    MrRidley – I am not sure on that one, as his arm was only a bit away from his body and for me is not an unnatural position, it would be unnatural for your arms not to come away from your body when jumping like that as they come out for balance. Mahrez did go over a bit easy for the free kick, if it had been in the area and a penalty given there would have been uproar.

    #920107

    NOLU
    Participant

    Lucky you ignore the Football league these days as you could have filled a whole column on the “mistakes” Kevin Wright made at the county Ground Saturday. Homer was not the word. Disgraceful performance from a referee if ever I saw one (and I have seen a few)

    #920326

    MrRidleyKemp
    Participant

    Paxman I agree on Morgan-I wouldn’t have called it, but I can absolutely see how it could have been given. The elbow is extended and it moves to the ball to block it. I know the rule is that there has to be “intent,” but I’ve seen that one given.

    Not that I mind…8 matches to go. I’m still wearing my old Topps Tiles sponsored shirt from League One for good luck 🙂

    #924103

    Swisspotter
    Participant

    Agree entirely about the Tadic penalty – it was right in front of me and I could not believe it was not given. The Mane red card also looked highly dubious at the time and I hope Saints are successful with the appeal. If there is any justice ….

Viewing 6 posts - 1 through 6 (of 6 total)

You must be logged in to reply this topic.