Arsenal fans appear torn over whether the club need Leicester’s Jamie Vardy, while supporters discuss who’s better placed for a title push in Manchester.
Share your opinions on all the latest topics right here.
Why do Arsenal need Vardy when they have Walcott?
I know people are undecided on Walcott but for me he should be kept. I ask why Vardy because we are after a player who has pace and wants to play up top yet we have Walcott who wants that. Before Walcott got injured he scored 21 goals or something like that for us in that season so why sign Vardy.
Yes he scored 24 league goals but he was allowed to play up top all season bar a few games Walcott wasn’t given that chance, so why not get a complete striker like Higuain or Lukaku? Also we are all expecting Vardy to come and then actually play through the middle for us!
Does everyone really have the faith that Wenger’s will do that? Seriously!
He was deployed on the left of a 3 for England and no don’t Wenger saw that and thought great he can do both jobs and then continue with Giroud up top and Vardy accommodated wider. I’d like to of seen Wenger show the same support to Walcott as what Vardy got last season at Leicester and then make a decision but he hasn’t and won’t. So again why sign Vardy when we have Walcott who is a very similar player.
Quick, likes to run behind/ off the shoulder of the defenders and given the same belief I think would get back to his best pre-injury. I think Wengers is too scared to spend the money on players we actually need because if it doesn’t work it just shows he isn’t good enough and hasn’t been good enough for a while now.
Are Manchester United better placed than City in a push for the title next season?