Ref Review: The incorrect decisions from week 33

This topic contains 13 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by  Paxman 7 years, 11 months ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #956201

    James Marshment
    Keymaster
    • :

    Our panel debate several highly-dubious decisions across the Premier League this weekend, with West Ham’s clash with Arsenal featuring.

    [See the full post at: Ref Review: The incorrect decisions from week 33]

    #956294

    Derek Belenger
    Participant
    • :

    How can the panel judge that Robert Huth should have had a penalty awarded against him for handball in the Sunderland game. Last week there was an even more blatant handball by him against Southampton.Again with no penalty given Yet the decision by your panel was that this was the correct decision.

    #956351
    banjo_chuckers
    banjo_chuckers
    Participant
    • :

    Shouldn’t this thread be titled “How to Troll Asrenal Fans!”? 🙂

    #956432

    Paxman
    Participant
    • :

    This review thing was supposed to be to review BIG decisions that change games, a free kick in the middle of the half and on the touch line is not a decision that changes games, in the case of the Milner free kick. That decision did not change the game, Stoke player switching off after it was given, and then failing even engage Moreno s what changed the game not the decision. I have seen any other marginally soft free kick in non dangerous areas be reviewed on here. Is that you Homzy? 🙂

    #956450
    Mark Holmes
    Mark Holmes
    Keymaster
    • :

    I wasn’t even on the panel this week, Pax, as I haven’t seen any of the goals! Well, I saw yours live (unfortunately), but I don’t plan on watching them again!

    #956486

    Paxman
    Participant
    • :

    I was only kidding Mark, I don’t blame I do the same, if we have lost I stay away from all highlight packages.

    #956513

    NOLU
    Participant
    • :

    Surly a decision can only been deemed wrong if all of the panel agree. 3 against 2 for example just becomes opinion again and doesn’t mean the decision was either right or wrong. Andy Carroll for example, whilst there was clearly no intent, the elbow being raised was at very least dangerous and could have caused injury, so yellow card minimum.

    #956525

    Paxman
    Participant
    • :

    NOLU – Do you want to ban jumping in football because you can’t jump effectively with raising you arms, to me it was even a free kick.

    #956546

    TheMenace10
    Participant
    • :

    Well, Carroll should have had a straight red on his first tackle. He stamps Koscielny from behind, and swings the other foot with full force with no intention to get the ball. In second half he elbows Gabriel in the face. And he still shouldn’t be sent off?

    #956558

    James Marshment
    Keymaster
    • :

    Re the Huth incidents: each handball is dealt with on its own merits. And our panel felt the ‘handball’ against Sunderland was far more clear cut than the one against Southampton were the ball was simply blasted against his hand. Cheers – Marshy

    #956564

    James Marshment
    Keymaster
    • :

    Pax – we debated whether to include the ‘foul’ on Milner in Ref Review this week, but since the (dead ball) pass that immediately followed led to a goal, we felt it worthy of inclusion. Cheers. -Marshy

    #956693

    Paxman
    Participant
    • :

    James – I can understand what you are saying, but my point is at the position the free kick is in if Stoke do their job then there is no goal by including it, it goes into the table as something that has gone for us in the same category as getting and undeserved penalty or a free kick that is scored directly, there is no way this should have been included, the more I think of it the more ridiculous it seems that it was included. Is someone get a free kick on the edge of there own box and it is knock to a player who then runs the length of the pitch and scores are you going to include that?

    #957242

    José
    Participant
    • :

    Did you actually watch the foul on Milner?! He is not off balance, he’s clearly tripped from behind by Bardsley! I cannot believe for one second, after going back and rewatching it myself, that you could have come to that conclusion while watching said foul.

    #957848

    Paxman
    Participant
    • :

    James – You have to admit you have got this one wrong.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply this topic.